Electronics Assembly Knowledge, Vision & Wisdom
Ball Pull Test Efficiency for the PCB Pad Cratering Validation
Ball Pull Test Efficiency for the PCB Pad Cratering Validation
In the study cold ball pull testing is used to validate the resistance of PCB pad cratering for different ultra-low loss dielectrics materials.
Analysis Lab

Authored By:
Jeffrey ChangBing, LeeCheng-Chih Chen, Alice Lin, Dem Lee
iST- Integrated Service Technology, Inc., TAIWAN
Gary Long, Consultant, USA
Masahiro Tsuriya, INEMI, JAPAN
,{url:'http://www.circuitinsight.com/videos/programs_final.mp4'}], clip:{autoBuffering:true, autoPlay:true, scaling:'scale' } }).ipad();
Cold ball pull testing is used to validate the resistance of PCB pad cratering for the different ultra-low loss dielectrics materials (Dk=3~4.2 and Df <= 0.005 @ 1GHz) in the study. The materials were fabricated in multiple PCB shops using a common test board design utilizing a coupon to result in a 16 mil nominal pad size for the pulls. After fabrication, a 20 mil SAC305 ball is SMT attached to the 16 mil nominal pads for pulling.

Each material had 3 coupons with 50 pull locations on each to generate 150 data points for statistical analysis. The peak pull force differences of the material builds can be compared to differentiate the results. As a result, the different ultra-low loss dielectric material's performance to withstand PCB pad cratering can be compared comprehensively with the cold ball pull test.
Cold ball pull testing allows PCB shops to compare which dielectric materials have the best performance to withstand pad cratering based on their process control so as to reduce the field return rate due to pad cratering in PCB assembly and in service life. The comparison of data from different PCB shops is still not suggested due to process deviations at the different shops.

The test method was demonstrated to be reproducible when carefully executed and produced no anomalous results, suggesting it is a good practical test. It was not concluded that the material with certain cold ball pull strength will be capable of withstanding actual PCB pad cratering during shipping and service life of product, but was able to provide differentiation between materials at a single fabricator, thus allowing the end user to select the best candidate material for that PCB shop. The next steps will be to determine peak pull force thresholds at which pad cratering happens when materials are used in real service. Relating this work to results of other methods, such as impact testing, spherical bend testing, DMA, etc. is recommended to accomplish that task. Thresholds are expected to be different depending on product design and fabricator process control.
Initially Published in the IPC Proceedings
Submit A Comment

Comments are reviewed prior to posting. Please avoid discussion of pricing or recommendations for specific products. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address.

Your Name






Please type the number displayed into the box. If you receive an error, you may need to refresh the page and resubmit the information.

Related Programs
bullet Expanding IEEE Std 1149.1 Boundary-Scan Architecture
bullet Test Probe Problems After Pin-In-Paste
bullet Signal Transmission Loss Due to Surface Roughness
bullet PCBA Inspection Concerns
bullet 3D Digital Stitching Imagery is Revolutionizing Failure Analysis and Product Analysis
bullet Review of Interconnect Stress Testing Protocols
bullet Novel Pogo-Pin Socket Design for Automated Linearity Testing
bullet Mechanical Shock and Drop Reliability Evaluation of the BGA Solder Joint Stack-Ups
bullet Chemical Data vs Electrical Data - Which is a Better Reliability Predictor
bullet Design for Testability to Overcome Functional Board Test Complexities
More Related Programs