Electronics Assembly Knowledge, Vision & Wisdom
Chemical Data vs Electrical Data - Which is a Better Reliability Predictor
Chemical Data vs Electrical Data - Which is a Better Reliability Predictor
This study looks to correlate IPC Chemical and Electrical CAF test results. The electrical testing utilized was found within the PCQR2 Database document.
Analysis Lab

Analysis Lab programs cover topics including:
Corrosion, Contamination, Data Acquisition, ESD and EOS, Inspection, Measurement, Profiling, Reliability, R&D, RFID, Solder Defects, Test, Tombstoning, X-ray and more.
Submit A Comment
Comments are reviewed prior to posting. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address.

Your Name


Your Company


Your E-mail


Your Country


Your Comment



Authored By:
Mark Northrup
IEC Electronics

Timothy A. Estes
Conductor Analysis Technologies, Inc.

Joe Russeau
Precision Analytical Laboratory, Inc.

Summary
The goal of this study was to correlate IPC Chemical and Electrical CAF test results. The electrical testing utilized for the test coupons was found within the PCQR2 Database document. The chemical testing of the coupons utilized Ion Chromatography (IC) testing in accordance with IPC-TM-650, method 2.3.28.

Conclusions
1. There currently are no Pass / Fail cleanliness criteria exist for the IPC ion chromatography method. Criteria used for this study was based on customer suggested levels.

2. The Current Pass / Fail criteria for CAF testing per PCQR2 are 107Ω latch level.

3. Per industry customer cleanliness criteria, the following groups failed chemical testing: * All, except P10 because there were no samples available after CAF testing

4. Per PCQR2 criteria the following groups failed electrical testing: * P5, P10, 08, 028 and 030

5. Neither method is a better CAF reliability predictor.

Initially Published in the SMTA Proceedings

Comments
No comments have been submitted to date.
Free Newsletter Subscription
Every issue of the Circuit Insight email newsletter will bring you the latest information on the issues affecting you and your company.

Insert Your Email Address

Directory Search


Program Search
Related Programs
bullet Risk for Ceramic Component Cracking Dependent
bullet Design for Testability to Overcome Functional Board Test Complexities
bullet Pad Crater Initiation in Shock Using Acoustic Emission Detection
bullet Flowers of Sulfur Creep Corrosion Testing of Populated PCBs
bullet Second Roung Robin Evaluation of iNEMI Creep Corrosion Qualification Test
bullet Board Level Reliability Comparison of BGA and LGA Packages
bullet PCBA Inspection Concerns
bullet AOI Capabilities Study with 03015 Components
bullet Ball Pull Test Efficiency for the PCB Pad Cratering Validation
bullet Implementing Robust Bead Probe Test Processes
More Related Programs