Electronics Assembly Knowledge, Vision & Wisdom
Advance Board Level Modeling Wafer Level Packages
Advance Board Level Modeling Wafer Level Packages
In this paper it is determined that the effective flexural modulus depends on the stackup and it often does not correlate with the effective tensile modulus.
Analysis Lab

Analysis Lab programs cover topics including:
Corrosion, Contamination, Data Acquisition, ESD and EOS, Inspection, Measurement, Profiling, Reliability, R&D, RFID, Solder Defects, Test, Tombstoning, X-ray and more.
Submit A Comment
Comments are reviewed prior to posting. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address.

Your Name

Your Company

Your E-mail

Your Country

Your Comment

Authored By:
Tiao Zhou, Ph.D.
Southern Methodist University
Dallas, TX, USA

Zhenxue Han, Ph.D.
University of Texas at Arlington
Arlington, TX, USA

Tingge Xu, and Hongbing Lu, Ph.D.
University of Texas at Dallas
Dallas, TX, USA

Kenna Wang
Creekview High School
Carrollton, TX, USA

In finite element analysis (FEA) of board level temperature cycling (TC) or drop test (DT) for wafer level packaging (WLP), the printed circuit board (PCB) is often simplified as a homogeneous material. The PCB effective elastic modulus is one of the key properties required for FEA. It is obtained from tensile test, bending test, or calculation. The tensile and flexural moduli however, often have significantly different values. The FEA results thus can be inaccurate if PCB modulus is not chosen properly.

In this paper, the effects of PCB stackup, metal contents and metal trace orientations on effective tensile and flexural moduli are studied. It is determined that the effective flexural modulus depends on the stackup and it often does not correlate with the effective tensile modulus. Observations are made to assess if the PCB deformation is tension/compression dominant or bending dominant during TC and DT. Guidelines for effective elastic modulus calculation from tensile and flexural moduli are given in order to minimize the error in FEA of WLP board level TC and DT.

PCB effective elastic modulus obtained from different methods are presented. The effect of choice of elastic modulus on FEA results is investigated. The following conclusions are made:

1. The values of tensile modulus and flexural modulus are different. The flexural modulus is stackup dependent while the tensile modulus is not.

2. Smaller trance angle on routing layers results in higher effective modulus. Using Cu content alone and ignoring trace routing detail overestimates the effective modulus.

3. When simplifying the PCB as a homogeneous material, using tensile or flexural modulus alone as the effective elastic modulus in both TC and DT FEA results in error. It is recommended that:

a. Use the greater of the tensile and flexural moduli as the effective modulus for TC

b. Use the flexural modulus as the effective modulus for DT

Initially Published in the SMTA Proceedings

No comments have been submitted to date.
Free Newsletter Subscription
Every issue of the Circuit Insight email newsletter will bring you the latest information on the issues affecting you and your company.

Insert Your Email Address

Directory Search

Program Search
Related Programs
bullet Failure Modes in Wire Bonded and Flip Chip Packages
bullet Evaluation of Molded Flip-chip BGA Packages
bullet Miniaturization of Hearing Aid Electronics Using Embedded Die Packaging
bullet Reliability of Fine Pitch Flip Chip BGA Packages for Automotive Applications
bullet Material Selection for Reliable TMV Pop Assembly
bullet Leadless Flip Chip PLGA for Networking Applications
bullet New Approaches to Develop a Scalable 3D IC Assembly Method
bullet Status and Outlooks of Flip Chip Technology
bullet Three Dimensional Integration Focusing on Device Embedded Substrate
bullet Multilayer Ceramic Capacitors: Mitigating Rising Failure Rates
More Related Programs