Electronics Assembly Knowledge, Vision & Wisdom
Evaluating Manual and Automated Heat Sink Assembly
Evaluating Manual and Automated Heat Sink Assembly
This paper illustrates the use of strain gauge testing and Finite Element Analysis as a simulation tool to optimize the heat sink assembly process.
Production Floor

Authored By:
Michael Randy Sumalinog
AEG-Asia, Flextronics Manufacturing Co.
Guangdong, Zhuhai, China

Jesus Tan, Murad Kurwa
AEG, Flextronics International Inc.
Milpitas, CA, USA
,{url:'http://www.circuitinsight.com/videos/programs_final.mp4'}], clip:{autoBuffering:true, autoPlay:true, scaling:'scale' } }).ipad();
Summary
Proper assembly of components is critical in the manufacturing industry as it affects functionality and reliability. In a heat sink assembly, a detailed manual process is often utilized. However, an automated fixture is used whenever applicable. This paper will illustrate the use of strain gauge testing and Finite Element Analysis (FEA) as a simulation tool to evaluate and optimize the heat sink assembly process by manual and automated methods.

Several PCBAs in the production line were subjected to the manual and automated assembly process. Strain gauge testing was performed and FEA models were built and run. Results were compared with the goal of improving the FEA model. The updated FEA model will be used in simulating different conditions in assembly. Proposed improvement solutions to some issues can also be verified through FEA.
Conclusions
The finite element models for FEA of a heat sink assembly by manual and automated processes have been presented in this paper. Based on results, automated assembly is preferred than the manual assembly process. The results of the analysis were compared to experimental data gathered through strain gauge testing. After several iterations, the differences between experimental and numerical results were reduced and trends were noted to achieve optimized FE models. These FE models can be used to perform other studies to improve strain values and avoid damaging board flexure. One such factor is the location of the BGAs on the printed circuit board.
Initially Published in the IPC Proceedings
Submit A Comment

Comments are reviewed prior to posting. Please avoid discussion of pricing or recommendations for specific products. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address.

Your Name


Company


E-mail


Country


Comments


Authentication

Please type the number displayed into the box. If you receive an error, you may need to refresh the page and resubmit the information.



Related Programs
bullet Screen Making for Printed Electronics
bullet Digitally Printed Battery Design
bullet Is There a Limit to the Step in a Step Stencil?
bullet Printing vs. Dispensing
bullet Optimization of Stencil Apertures to Compensate for Scooping
bullet How Effective Is Nano Coating On Stencils?
bullet Solution for Grape Effect
bullet Wearable Electronics & Big Data = High Volume, High Mix SMT
bullet 01005 Component Challenges and Bugs
bullet Bottom Side Chip Bonding
More Related Programs