|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using X-ray to Detect Counterfeit Components
Analysis Lab |
|
Authored By:Art Ogg World Micro, Roswell, GA USA TranscriptMuch has been said and written about the accuracy of visual inspections of potentially counterfeit components. The techniques and procedures being used to inspect counterfeit and reworked electronic components in the open marketplace can be quite effective in most cases. The Independent Distributors of Electronics Association has produced an industry accepted inspection standard, IDEA Standard Ten Ten. It provides a wealth of information about visually inspecting components, and in most cases will allow the inspector to make preliminary decisions about the legitimacy of any given part. This paper provides additional knowledge about new techniques using x-ray photography methods recently developed that will speed the detection and accuracy during the process of inspecting counterfeit components. X-ray photographs of counterfeited components along with the explanations detailing how they were detected, are explained in this document. Often overlooked clues left behind by even the most experienced counterfeiters are discussed. So what were the conclusions? Given that a detail-oriented counterfeit component diagnostician can be quite effective, basing an evaluation solely on visual attributes will always have its limitations. With the current trend toward increased craftsmanship by the groups who engage in the act of counterfeiting, it is becoming nearly impossible to detect every style used. Quality inspectors can no longer just look at parts under a microscope and make the final judgment about their legitimacy. Without the use of an X-ray system to verify the internals of a component, a visual inspection process can lead to false assumptions about component quality. This study shows examples of how X-rays can be used to verify a group of parts with different dies. The aerospace, military and especially the medical industries will soon make X-ray a required requisite step that must be included before any organization can certify a group of components to be production ready. The single most important limitation of utilizing an X-ray system to verify that a part is valid, is that the inspector cannot usually make a final judgment in the absence of a image of a known good part for comparison. This can be resolved over time by creating a library of images. The study has also shown that certain types of manufacturing defects can be seen using X-ray systems along with major E.O.S. and E.S.D. type damages. Finally, most counterfeit components have had modifications done to the exterior or the component. Not all of these modifications will be detected by visual examination, some will still require the use of an X-ray system. This requirement will become more prevalent as the counterfeiters increase the quality of their work. SummaryMuch has been said and written about the accuracy of visual attribute inspections of potentially counterfeit components. The techniques and procedures being used to inspectcounterfeit and reworked electronic components in the open marketplace can be quite effective in most cases. The Independent Distributors of Electronics Association (www.IDofEA.org) has produced an industry acceptedinspection standard, IDEA-STD-1010. It provides a wealth of information about visually inspecting components and in most cases will allow the inspector to make preliminary decisions about the legitimacy of any given part. This paper will provide additional knowledge about new techniques using x-ray photography acquisition methods recently developed that will speed the detection and accuracy during the process of inspecting counterfeit components. X-ray photographs of counterfeited parts along with the explanations detailing how they were detected are explained in this document. Often overlooked clues left behind by even the most experienced counterfeiters are discussed. ConclusionsGiven that a detail oriented counterfeit electronic component diagnostician that has been certified to conduct Quality inspections can be quite effective, basing an evaluation solely on a visual attribute process will always have its limitations. With the current trend over the last 12-18 months in increased craftsmanship displayed by the groups who engage in the act of counterfeiting, it is becoming nearly impossible to detect every style used. It is obvious that more money is being used to increase the Quality of methodologies that produce counterfeit components. Quality inspectors can no longer just look at parts under a microscope and make the final judgment about their legitimacy. Without the use of an X-ray system to verify the internals of a component, an inspection process has an exposure by making false assumptions about component Quality. This study has shown examples of how X-ray was used to verify a group of parts with different dies to be certified by the OCM as meeting specifications. It has shown examples of how the inspector has proven parts to be fake, even to the point of not having a die inside the component. The aerospace, military and especially the medical industries will soon make X-ray a required requisite step that must be included before any organization may certify a group of components to be production ready. The single most important limitation of utilizing an X-ray system to verify a part is valid, is the inspector cannot usually make a final judgment in the absence of a picture of a known good part for comparison. This can be resolved over time by creating a library of photos that pass all the specifications. The study has also shown that certain types of manufacturing defects can be seen using X-ray systems along with major EOS/ESD type damages. Finally, most counterfeit components have had modifications done to the exterior or the component. Not all of these will be detected by visual examination. Some will require the inspector to use an X-ray system. This requirement will become more prevalent as the counterfeiters increase the quality of their work. Initially Published in the SMTA Proceedings |
|
Comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|