circuit insight

Panel Level Package (PLP) – Scaling up Fan-Out Packaging



Panel Level Package (PLP) – Scaling up Fan-Out Packaging
The persistent push for electronics miniaturization calls for a different approach to make packages smaller, higher performance and lower cost. Fan-out (FO) packages are well suited to serve this market trend. Via interconnects between the chip and package RDL (redistribution layers) provide higher interconnect density and lower inductance.
Materials Tech

DOWNLOAD

Authored By:


Burton Carpenter, Mollie Flick
NXP Semiconductors
TX, USA

Kuan Hsiang Mao, Cliff Kuo, Vanessa Tan, Anita Chou
NXP Semiconductors
Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Dominic Koey
NXP Semiconductors
Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

Summary


The persistent push for electronics miniaturization calls for a different approach to make packages smaller, higher performance and lower cost. Fan-out (FO) packages are well suited to serve this market trend. Via interconnects between the chip and package RDL (redistribution layers) provide higher interconnect density and lower inductance than traditional FC (flip chip) or WB (wire bond) connections. Furthermore, elimination of substrate or leadframe pieceparts simplifies the supply chain. FO packages are used in a range of end market applications including mobile, IOT (internet of things), consumer, industrial, automotive and AI (artificial intelligence).

The initial FO package manufacturing format was identical to a 200mm wafer to leverage existing WLCSP (wafer-level chip scale package) infrastructure. This FOWLP (fan-out wafer-level package) met performance requirements, but the small round manufacturing form factor proved inefficient, especially for lager package sizes. Later expansion to 300mm slightly improved efficiency and utilization. However, the large (up to 700mm) rectangular format utilized by PLP (panel level package) is a game changer.

While similar, the PLP final package is not identical to a FOWLP. Differences in materials, process, and final structure required package reliability validation. This paper summarizes reliability results for a 0.5mm pitch, 5mm PLP with one RDL layer. The package passed all component level and board level stresses for mobile and commercial applications. Margin was verified when it also passed all read points at >2x the required durations. Freestanding component package stresses were JEDEC MSL1/260°C (moisture sensitivity level 1), HAST 110°C (highly accelerated stress test), HTSL 175°C (high temp storage life). Board level reliability (BLR) included both daisy-chain and functional parts cycled from -40°C to +125°C.

Conclusions


A Panel Level Package (PLP) test vehicle (TV) was designed and stressed to demonstrate reliability in mobile and commercial applications. In summary:
  • A PLP78 package design was created which improved over the incumbent QFN:
  • Smaller package (5mm vs. 7mm)
  • More I/O (78 vs. 56)
  • Lower inductance by eliminating wires
  • Streamlined supply chain (no leadframe)
  • Wafer dicing with protective film
  • JEDEC moisture sensitivity (Level 1 vs. 3)
  • Board level reliability passed -40°C to 125°C cycling:
  • Exceeded 3400 cycles using a PLP78 daisy-chain.
  • Application level testing with the PLP78 functional version verified that components on board were functional to 1500 cycles with no evidence of internal package fracturing.
  • Component level stresses all exceeded application requirements.
  • Two repassivation materials both met requirements, but the one with higher fracture stress provides more margin.
  • Future work will include larger packages, two layers of RDL, and Auto grade reliability.


Initially Published in the SMTA Proceedings

Comments

No comments have been submitted to date.

Submit A Comment


Comments are reviewed prior to posting. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address.

Your Name


Your Company
Your E-mail


Your Country
Your Comments