Research
Implementing Robust Bead Probe Test Processes
Via-In Pad Plated Over (VIPPO) Design Considerations
Screening of Lower Melting Point Pb-Free Alloys
Condensation Testing - A New Approach
Case Study for Improving the PCB Print Process Using Factory Data
DFX on High Density Assemblies
Improved SMT and BLR of 0.35 mm Pitch Wafer Level Packages
Wetting and Solidification of Pure Tin on Polycrystalline Intermetallic Substrates
MORE RESEARCH
Latest Industry News
MacBook, iPad Production Delayed as Supply Crunch Hits Apple
Microsoft unveils liquid cooling solution for datacenters
A Theory of (Almost) Everything
Toyota unveils new models in advanced driver-assist technology push
Tech Giants Enter Their Chips in the Race for Self-driving Cars
What will self-driving trucks mean for truck drivers?
4 Great Things That Happened When We Went Remote
iPhone 13 is going to be worth the wait: All the major upgrades we're looking forward to
MORE INDUSTRY NEWS

Enhancing Reliability of PB-Free Solder Joints



Enhancing Reliability of PB-Free Solder Joints
This paper reviews the physical properties of different underfills and how they affect performance through reliability testing.
Materials Tech

DOWNLOAD

Authored By:


Brian Toleno, Tom White
Rong Zhang, and Jeff Bowin
Henkel Corporation
Irvine, CA, USA

Transcript


Microelectronics devices are moving toward high density interconnects. The use of flip chips, CSPs and BGAs has increased over the past several years to meet these needs.

It has been found that CSPs and BGAs have particular benefit from the use of underfills to meet reliability requirements. Typically underfill materials for these devices differ significantly.

>In this paper the authors compare the reliability of several types of under fill materials across several sizes of area array components.
vThe reliability of these devices are evaluated using industry standard thermal cycling and drop tests methodologies

The improvement of reliability of these devices through the use of underfill systems is evaluated. The physical properties of different underfills, and how those physical properties affect the performance in different types of reliability testing and across different packages are also compared.

Summary


Microelectronics devices are moving toward high-density interconnects. The use of flip chips, chip scale packages (CSP's) and ball grid arrays (BGA's) has increased over the past years to meet these needs. It has been found that CSPs and BGAs have particular benefit from the use of underfills to meet assembly reliability requirements. Typically, underfill materials for these devices differ significantly in their formulation to provide different types of protection.

Underfill materials were initially developed to provide coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) matching for flip chip devices (and now wafer level CSPs). These materials have a high degree of filler and are typically non-reworkable. Underfill systems designed for CSP devices for hand-held electronics tend to be unfilled, reworkable, and reinforce devices for shock and drop.

In this paper the authors compare the reliability of several types of underfill materials across several sizes of area array components: 0.4mm pitch wafer level chip scale packages (WLCSP) and 0.5 mm pitch chip scale packages (CSP), 0.8mm pitch and 1.0mm pitch BGA devices. The reliability of these devices (all Pb-free), are evaluated using industry standard thermal cycling and drop test methodologies. The improvement of the reliability of these devices thorough the use of underfill systems is evaluated. The physical properties of different underfills and how those physical properties affect the performance in the different types of reliability testing and across different packages are also compared.

Conclusions


With the variety of underfill systems available in the market, choosing the correct system for the reliability required is critical. In this study, two materials who have similar physical properties were evaluated. Both have low Tg and are reworkable, but perform very differently in reliability testing.

While underfill A performs poorly in thermal cycling testing, it outperfoms underfill B in drop testing. Ideally, the material of choice would perform the well in both types of testing.

Future work includes more studies that evaluate drop testing on package-level underfill systems and investigating new systems that strive to provide good thermal cycling performance as well as provide drop test enhcancement.

Initially Published in the SMTA Proceedings

Comments

No comments have been submitted to date.

Submit A Comment


Comments are reviewed prior to posting. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address.

Your Name


Your Company
Your E-mail


Your Country
Your Comments



Board Talk
Solder Paste Volume for BGA Rework
Reflow For Rigid Flex
Delay Before Cleaning Partial Assemblies
Problems With Starved "J" Lead Joints
Solder Paste Transfer Efficiency - What/Why
Can a CTE Mismatch Cause Reliability Problems?
Going Beyond Your Solder Paste Work Life
Issues Mixing Silicone and Acrylic Conformal Coatings
MORE BOARD TALK
Ask the Experts
Bottom Terminated Components and Vias
Is Solder Mask Considered an Insulator
Reduce Glare During Assembly
BGA BAll Sheer Testing
Components Jumping Around During Reflow
Floor Life of MSD Parts
QFN Open Solder Joints
Delamination Causing Scrap
MORE ASK THE EXPERTS