Research
Fill the Void II: An Investigation into Methods of Reducing Voiding
Wettable-Flanks On Bottom-Termination Components in Mass Production
Improved Flux Reliability of Lead-Free Solder Alloy Solder Paste
Investigation into Lead-Free Low Silver Solder Wire for Electronics
Effects of Composition and Isothermal Aging on Microstructure Performance
How Does Printed Solder Paste Volume Affect Solder Joint Reliability?
Wearable Electronics & Big Data = High Volume, High Mix SMT
Evaluation of Molded Flip-chip BGA Packages
MORE RESEARCH
Latest Industry News
MIT Turns 'Magic' Material Into Versatile Electronic Devices
U.S. Commerce Dept. presses Taiwan for more chips to automakers
Ford is betting that solid-state batteries will cut EV costs
How to Be a Role Model of Resilience
IoT and the circular economy
Embedded Vision at the Tipping Point
Dell lays out its plans for the future
Ford And Volkswagen Have Major Breakthrough On Self-Driving Cars
MORE INDUSTRY NEWS

Board, Package and Die Thickness Effects Under Thermal Cycling Conditions



A model that enables the scaling of solder joint failure cycles for board and die or substrate thickness effects under thermal cycling conditions is discussed.
Analysis Lab

DOWNLOAD

Authored By:


Jean-Paul Clech
EPSI Inc.
Montclair, NJ, USA

Summary


This paper presents a first-order model that enables the scaling of solder joint failure cycles for board and/or die or substrate thickness effects under thermal cycling conditions. The model also allows for the prediction of failure cycles for solder joints of double-sided, mirrored assemblies based on failure data for single-sided assemblies.

Conclusions


A first-order design-for-reliability tool / model has been developed that captures the impact of board and/or component thickness on solder joint reliability under thermal cycling conditions.

The tool allows for scaling of failure cycles from one board thickness to another, or from one assembly configuration to another (single-sided or mirrored).

Solder joint life under thermal cycling conditions goes as the inverse of the assembly stiffness.

The model has been validated against thermal cycling results for 1 to 3.3 mm thick test boards and 0.2 to 3.7 mm thick components.

The model also accounts for the global CTE mismatch between board and component, as well as the component size (DNP) effect.

Other important parameters, such as stand-off height, assembly pitch and pad sizes are being added to the model (to be presented in a future publication).

The model is algebraic and is easily implemented in a spreadsheet. This allows for quick assessments of the relative impact of changes in design parameters and material properties on solder joint reliability, independent of soft solder compositions.

The board thickness effect is confounded with concurrent changes in in-plane moduli and CTEs. The interpretation of thermal cycling test results and the extrapolation of test data to field conditions rely heavily on realistic estimates, or better, measurements of board properties. In our updated survey of test board properties from multiple sources (Figure 19), board modulus is anywhere in the range 10 to 30 GPa and inplane CTEs are in the range 12 to 21 ppm/degree C. Effective board properties vary widely and cannot be assigned randomly when entered into reliability models.

The stiffness or strength-of-materials approach, which is the foundation of the board and component thickness model, provides qualitative and quantitative insight into controlling parameters and competing factors: a) the board and component stiffness in flexure and under axial loading; b) the distance H that separates the neutral planes of the board and of the component. The latter increases the compliance of thicker board assemblies, a potential factor in some thick boards having longer solder joint lives than thin board assemblies as observed in accelerated thermal cycling and finite element simulations (Teng et al., 2002; Shih et al., 2004; Wu et al., 2014).

These situations were not modeled in this paper because relevant board and package material properties were not available.

Initially Published in the SMTA Proceedings

Comments

No comments have been submitted to date.

Submit A Comment


Comments are reviewed prior to posting. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address.

Your Name


Your Company
Your E-mail


Your Country
Your Comments



Board Talk
Cure for the Grape Effect
Removing Warpage from PCBAs
Solder Paste Inspection - When and Why
Predicting Mid-Chip Solder Balling
Will Typical No Clean Paste Pass an SIR Test?
How Do You Remove Oxidation from PCBs?
Consensus for Baking Prior to Rework?
How Many Fiducials Per Stencil
MORE BOARD TALK
Ask the Experts
Question About Dry Storage of PCBA's
Baking Concerns for Stacked Trays of Components
Two Year Component Date Code Mandate
Assembly Question for Soldering USB Connectors
Tough Hand Soldering Problem
Challenges with 01005 Components
What Is Causing Connectors to Bow?
Acceptability Standard for Plated Hole Barrel Fill
MORE ASK THE EXPERTS