|
|
|
||||||||
What is an Acceptable Level of Exposed Copper?
Board Talk
|
||||||||
TranscriptPhil Welcome to Board Talk. We're the Assembly Brothers, Jim Hall and Phil Zarrow of ITM Consulting. Jim, what is today's questions. Jim The question is: Is there a general specification for an acceptable level of exposed copper for circuit conductors on circuit boards where all the copper surfaces are gold plated? And a further question is: What problems could we see if there are very small non-contact areas on some conductors that have exposed copper? Phil The thing here is, we would politely say, This a process indicator. It's also a supplier indicator. What kind of crappy boards are you buying? What's with this exposed copper? Hey, it's supposed to be gold plated, why the hell is the copper showing through here? You know what's going on here? This is a process out of control. Jim It's expensive. Jim Now what happens in real life? Some board fabricators are reasonable about that, they try to keep it low, but well within the specs. Others try to take it right to the limit of the spec. Phil Jim Phil Jim If it is a ENIG finish and you got exposed copper, then Phil's right; not only did they not get the gold on, but they didn't get the nickel on, which brings us to another thing that you have to ask is: Was it not a problem with the gold being too thin but the fact that the copper wasn't cleaned adequately underneath, and that's death with any finish. Just remember, I don't care what your surface finish is - OSP, immersionsilver, HASL or anything, you're starting with bare copper and you've got to get that copper clean. All of the surface coating methodologies start by actually etching a little bit of the copper off to get any deep seated corrosion. You get down to really virgin copper. So whatever finish you put on gold or nickel or whatever, you can get a good complete coverage. Phil Jim |
||||||||
Comments
|
||||||||
|
|
![]() |