Embedded Components from Concept-To-Manufacturing
Copper Foil Elements Affecting Transmission Loss with High Speed Circuits
pH neutral Cleaning Agents - Market Expectation & Field Performance
Reducing Dust Deposition on Electronic Equipment
New Requirements for Sir Measurement
Effects of Mixing Solder Sphere Alloys with Bismuth-Based Pastes
The Development of a 0.3 mm Pitch CSP Assembly Process
Generalizations About Component Flatness at Elevated Temperature
Latest Industry News
iPhone 12 Production Could Be Delayed
Acer sees PC component shortages
Bio-Ink for 3-D Printing Inside the Body
Covid Seen Driving the Security Sector
U.S. Eases Restrictions on Private Remote-Sensing Satellites
EMS Manufacturing quote complexity drives OEMs to look behind EMS curtain
U.S. Manufacturing Rebounds to 14-Month High
IBM's New AI Tool Parses A Tidal Wave of Coronavirus Research

Optimization of Robotic Soldering Process: Solder Spread and Spattering

Optimization of Robotic Soldering Process: Solder Spread and Spattering
Robotic soldering is a growing market. We will present how cored wires with different flux percentages will affect robotic soldering performance.
Analysis Lab


Authored By:

Robert McKerrow, Indium Corporation


Robotic soldering is a growing market within the PCB Assembly industry and interest in robotic soldering equipment and applications is increasing every year. This method is more efficient than hand soldering and will aid in alleviating human mistakes. The robotic soldering process is more controlled and repeatable than a selective soldering fountain, and it can increase productivity and profitability. As the industry grows, we’ve found that there is not enough published data regarding this soldering technique. In this paper, we will present how cored wires with different flux percentages will affect robotic soldering performance. All wires used in this project were SAC305 alloy with a 0.020” diameter and 3%, 3.5%, 4%, or 4.5% of flux.


In a robotic soldering assembly process, there will not be any direct human interaction in regard to forming the solder joint. Therefore, it is generally accepted that the assembler will want to use as much flux as possible to ensure wetting occurs and the ensuing solder joint is adequate. When the flux percentage was increased from 3% incrementally to 4.5% using the same core flux formula, there were some improvements shown in the rate of wetting and the spread of the solder. While this may be attractive when considering cycle times and overall production output, there is another factor that should be considered: spatter. In our study, it was determined that spattering is influenced by formula more than flux percentage. As can be seen in our formula control group, the spattering performance of each board is relatively similar using flux percentages ranging from 3% to 4.5%.

Initially Published in the SMTA Proceedings


No comments have been submitted to date.

Submit A Comment

Comments are reviewed prior to posting. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address.

Your Name

Your Company
Your E-mail

Your Country
Your Comments

Board Talk
Solder Paste Beyond The Shelf Life?
Issues With Fillets on Via Holes?
Can Tape Residue Contaminate a Clean Tank?
Suggested Stencil Wipe Frequency?
Reflow Oven Zone Separation Challenges
When To Use Adhesive To Bond SMT Components
How To Clean a Vintage Circuit Board Assembly?
PCBA Inspection Concerns
Ask the Experts
Lifted Lead on SOT Component
Allowable Bow and Twist on Round PC Fab
Mixed MSL Baking
Step Stencil Squeegee Angle
Solder Balling Splash After Reflow
Application Using No-Clean and Water Soluble Fluxes
IPC SOIC Defect Question
Mixed Process Solder Joint Appearance, Smooth or Grainy?