Electronics Assembly Knowledge, Vision & Wisdom
Testing of Soldering Materials vs. Soldering Processes
Testing of Soldering Materials vs. Soldering Processes
This paper discusses Surface Insulation Resistance (SIR) data of solder pastes and other soldering materials on IPCB-52 coupons.
Production Floor

Production Floor programs cover topics including:
CAD/CAM/CIM/EDA, Circuit Board Handling, Clean Room, Cleaning Operations, Component Insertion, Component Prep, Dispensing, Feeders, Fume Extraction, Hand Tools, Labeling/Marking, Lasers, Material Handling, Odd Form, Ovens/Curing, Packaging, Stencil Printing, Repair/Rework, Soldering and more.
Submit A Comment
Comments are reviewed prior to posting. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address.

Your Name

Your Company

Your E-mail

Your Country

Your Comment

Authored By:
Karen Tellefsen, Ph.D.
Alpha, an Alent plc Company
South Plainfield, NJ, USA

Manufacturers of soldering materials have been asked by electronics device manufacturers and contract electronics PWB assemblers for Surface Insulation Resistance (SIR) data of solder pastes and other soldering materials on IPCB-52 coupons. IPC-B-52 coupons were designed for evaluating the electrochemical reliability of the whole soldering process, not just the materials, used by PWB assemblers. The bare coupons should made by the same board fabricator using the same materials and processes as the boards used by the PWB assemblers. Additionally, the test coupons should be assembled and soldered by the PWB assemblers themselves. Having a soldering material manufacturer or a commercial test laboratory assemble and solder the coupons using a IPC-B-52 kit will not provide the complete benefit of evaluating the whole soldering process, i.e. all the materials and processes used by the manufacturers. The completely assembled and soldered coupons may then be tested for SIR to a standard test method, such as IPC TM 650 Method, by the assembler, a commercial laboratory or the material manufacturer.

The present SIR and ElectroChemical Migration (ECM) testing methods for soldering materials do not address the electrochemical failure mechanism concerns of flux residues trapped under component and the ever shrinking spacing between solder joints. However, requiring the use of complex and expensive IPC-B-52 coupons for material evaluation is a poor solution for this issue. New test vehicles for soldering materials that include occluded flux residue and tighter board spacing are needed.

This paper asks more questions than it answers. However:
  • IPC-B-52 coupons were intended for entire electronics process evaluation, and are not appropriate for single soldering materials evaluation.
  • SIR test vehicles for soldering materials evaluation need to have smaller conductor spacing than those presently specified.
  • An SIR test vehicle needs to be developed that will evaluate the propensity of a material to allow ECM with occluded flux residue.
  • SIR and ECM temperature and humidity conditions need to be reexamined as some materials have better SIR and less tendency for ECM at 40C / 90% R.H. and other materials have better behavior at 85C / 85% R.H.

Initially Published in the SMTA Proceedings

No comments have been submitted to date.
Free Newsletter Subscription
Every issue of the Circuit Insight email newsletter will bring you the latest information on the issues affecting you and your company.

Insert Your Email Address

Directory Search

Program Search
Related Programs
bullet Risk for Ceramic Component Cracking Dependent
bullet Design for Testability to Overcome Functional Board Test Complexities
bullet Pad Crater Initiation in Shock Using Acoustic Emission Detection
bullet Flowers of Sulfur Creep Corrosion Testing of Populated PCBs
bullet Second Roung Robin Evaluation of iNEMI Creep Corrosion Qualification Test
bullet Board Level Reliability Comparison of BGA and LGA Packages
bullet PCBA Inspection Concerns
bullet AOI Capabilities Study with 03015 Components
bullet Ball Pull Test Efficiency for the PCB Pad Cratering Validation
bullet Implementing Robust Bead Probe Test Processes
More Related Programs