Electronics Assembly Knowledge, Vision & Wisdom
Is Customer Approval Required for Class 3 Repair?
Is Customer Approval Required for Class 3 Repair?
We have a case where a non-aerospace customer's board was repaired without prior authorization. It was for a class 3 assembly. Does it specify in an IPC document that customer approval is required for class 3 repairs?
Board Talk

,{url:'http://www.circuitinsight.com/videos/board_talk_class_3.mp4'}], clip:{autoBuffering:true, autoPlay:true, scaling:'scale' } }).ipad();
Board Talk is presented by ITM Consulting
Phil Zarrow
Phil Zarrow, ITM Consulting
With over 35 years experience in PCB assembly, Phil is one of the leading experts in SMT process failure analysis. He has vast experience in SMT equipment, materials and processes.


Jim Hall
Jim Hall, ITM Consulting
A Lean Six-Sigma Master Blackbelt, Jim has a wealth of knowledge in soldering, thermal technology, equipment and process basics. He is a pioneer in the science of reflow.
Transcript
Phil
And welcome to Board Talk with Phil Zarrow and Jim Hall of ITM Consulting, the Assembly Brothers.

We're here to talk about electronic assembly, materials, equipment, components, practices and procedures, among many other things. Jim, what is today's question?

Jim
Well, it comes from S.L. We have a case where a non-aerospace customer's board was repaired without prior authorization. It was for a class 3 assembly.

The question is does it specify in an IPC document that customer approval is required for class 3 repairs?

Phil
Let's go look to the holy scriptures of IPC for all of the answers to life and the meaning thereof. Most likely not.

Because this would be the type of thing that would be somewhat contractual, and I would also say application specific in terms of how much repair should be allowed.

But the whole idea of whether it is allowed or not that is basically between the customer and whoever is building the board and what is agreed upon.

Don't keep going to the IPC or the SMTA or the IEEE or who knows what, the AFLCIO to look for regulations for everything.

This is something that would be agreed upon, based on the type of components you are dealing with, how much repair rework should be allowed for those.

There may be some indication in that, some of the specifications or recommendations.

But in general it is basically agreed and it is driven by the application and the service and reliability expectations of that particular application.

Jim
I'm not the world's greatest expert on IPC specs, but I agree that I don't believe they get into defining change of authorization and things like that.

They define what you need to do, how you communicate it, how you may document it, and so forth. And I agree with you I don't think that they should.

It should be decided by the parties involved.

Phil
Well, whether you agree or disagree with Board Talk, remember the secretary disavows any knowledge of our actions and this recording is going to self-destruct in ten seconds.

So good luck, Jim. And Jim, whatever you do..

Jim
Don't solder like my brother.

Phil
And don't solder like my brother.
Reader Comment

Under IPC or J STD. The assemblies can be reworked/repaired. This question should all ways be clear in the contract and quote. If the RFQ doesn't call it out I would add a note stating rework/repairs will be conducted under the workmanship standard.

Paul Horn
Reader Comment

Totally agree. Repair method is agreed between customer and contractor. By the way, anyone know where I can get a job like Stadem's where I can exercise my ego by reciting IPC specs all day?

M Mota, MET
Reader Comment

Yes indeed the IPC/J-STD-001 states that for class 3 products the customer has to approve of repairs. But like the commenters said before there is a difference between repair and rework, so make sure you do understand the difference. The criteria on rework are quite different.

Furthermore if J-STD-001 is not specified in the contract then it is not applicable, so then it depends on how the contract is made. F.i. it could be that repairs are excluded by the customer anyway (and even rework for that matter). So you can not answer this with yes or no. It depends on how the contract is laid out and what IPC documents apply for this product.


Frank Huijsmans, PIEK I.E.C
Reader Comment

I think there needs to be some clarification. They said it was and end user board that was repaired. Was in WIP or was it a return? If it was WIP then it could be rework and not repair. If it was return then definitely repair and even if not required for a class 3 customer I would notify them.

Earl Plotner, Cinch
Reader Comment

The simplest way to address such questions is to realise that IPC specifies mechanism, not policy. In other words, IPC standards do not dictate whether repairs or rework are allowed, but do dictate how they are to be done and documented.

Donald H Locker, Pi Innovo, LLC
Reader Comment

Such requirements are Quality Management Requirements and you can have these in the AS9100 standard, if the product is for aerospace or mil end-use.

The organization shall not use dispositions of use-as-is or repair, unless specifically authorized by the customer, if the nonconformity results in a departure from the contract requirements.

You might also probably find similar rules in customer quality requirements or other QMS standards dedicated to high reliability products.


Christophe Auburtin, FEDD
Reader Comment

From IPC 7711/7721. Highlights are mine. I hope this answers your questions.

1.2.2 Requirements Flowdown
The applicable requirements of this document must be imposed by each manufacturer or supplier on all applicable subcontracts and purchase orders. The manufacturer or supplier must not impose or allow any variation from these requirements on subcontracts or purchase orders other than those that have been approved by the user. Unless otherwise specified, the requirements of this document are not imposed on the procurement of off the shelf assemblies or subassemblies. However, the manufacturer of these items may comply as deemed appropriate.

1.4.1 Classification
The user of the product is responsible for identifying the Class of Product. The procedure selected for action to be taken (modification, rework, repair, overhaul etc.) must be consistent with the Class identified by the user. The three Classes of Product are:

1. Class 1 - General Electronic Products Includes products for applications where the major requirement is the function of the completed assembly.

2. Class 2 - Dedicated Service Electronic Products Includes products where continued performance and extended life is required, and for which uninterrupted service is desired but not critical. Typically, the end use environment would not cause failures.

3. Class 3 - High Performance Electronic Products Includes products where continued performance or performance-on-demand is critical. Equipment downtime cannot be tolerated, end-use environment may be uncommonly harsh, and the equipment must function where required, such as life support and other critical systems.

3. Repair
The act of restoring the functional capability of a defective article in a manner that precludes compliance of the article with applicable drawings or specifications. Repairs are generally changes to an unacceptable end product to make it acceptable in accordance with original functional requirements. The control of repaired products should be by means of Material Review Board (MRB), or its equivalent, which may consist of
Design Engineering, Quality Assurance, and User representatives.

The MRB, with technical support, should define the mutually acceptable repair method to be used and take the action necessary to ensure that all applicable procedures are adhered to. Repair of a failure in the field seldom includes an MRB, and typically is done in accordance with a contract, repair/service order or the user-activity maintenance program requirements. The maximum number of repairs per printed wiring board assembly should be
determined by the using activity or agency.

1.7 Basic Considerations
1. Appropriate Approvals Appropriate approvals should be obtained before proceeding with PC board modification, rework or repair. Such approvals should include agreements as to acceptance criteria and limitations.


Richard Stadem, General Dynamics Mission Systems, USA
Reader Comment

I agree that this is dependent on contractual requirements, but IPC does address this issue. From J-STD-001F, Section 13.2 Repair, Repair is the act of restoring the functional capability of a defective article in a manner that does not assure compliance of the article with applicable drawings or specifications. A hardware defect shall not [N1D2D3] be repaired until the discrepancy has been documented. The repair method shall [N1D2D3] be determined by agreement between the Manufacturer and the User. Customer approval is required for repair if J-STD-001 is part of the contract.

Kenneth Robinson, Lockheed Martin, USA
Reader Comment

J-STD-001F section 13 rework and repair; clause 13.2 states, "Repair is the act of restoring the functional capability of a defective article in a manner that does not assure compliance of the article with applicable drawings or specifications. A hardware defect shall not be repaired until the discrepancy has been documented. The repair method shall be determined by agreement between the Manufacturer and the User. This is required for Class 3.

Guy Ramsey, RDIS, USA
Reader Comment

Yes IPC-J-STD-001E and F version specified that repair method shall [If not Defect for class 2 and 3] be determined by agreement between the Manufacturer and the User. See 13.2. Watch out different between Repair and Rework.

Ron, PIEK I.E.C., Netherlands
Submit A Comment

Comments are reviewed prior to posting. Please avoid discussion of pricing or recommendations for specific products. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address.

Your Name


Company


E-mail


Country


Comments


Authentication

Please type the number displayed into the box. If you receive an error, you may need to refresh the page and resubmit the information.



Related Programs
bullet BGA Rework Flux Recommendation
bullet Practices to Assure Consistent Hot Gas Rework
bullet Is Pre-Bake Standard for Rework?
bullet Rework of Large Surface Mount Connectors
bullet Is Customer Approval Required for Class 3 Repair?
bullet Through-Hole Rework for Challenging Components
bullet SMT Components Popping Off During Reflow
bullet Rework Challenges for Smart Phones and Tablets
bullet Test Method to Characterize Pad Cratering
bullet A Case of Missing SMT Pads
More Related Programs
About | Advertising | Contact | Directory | Directory Search | Directory Submit | Privacy | Programs | Program Search | Sponsorship | Subscribe | Terms

Circuit Insight
6 Liberty Square #2040, Boston MA 02109 USA

Jeff Ferry, Publisher | Ken Cavallaro, Editor/Business Manager

Copyright © Circuitnet LLC. All rights reserved.
A Circuitnet Media Publication