Electronics Assembly Knowledge, Vision & Wisdom
Analysis of Laminate Material Properties for Correlation to Pad Cratering
Analysis of Laminate Material Properties for Correlation to Pad Cratering
In this study, two Pb-free-compatible laminates were tested, with one dicy-cure non-Pb-free-compatible as control.
Analysis Lab

Analysis Lab programs cover topics including:
Corrosion, Contamination, Data Acquisition, ESD and EOS, Inspection, Measurement, Profiling, Reliability, R&D, RFID, Solder Defects, Test, Tombstoning, X-ray and more.
Authored By:
Carlos Morill, Yan Ning, Michael Pecht, Michael H. Azarian
University of Maryland, Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering (CALCE)
College Park, MD USA

Julie Silk
Keysight Technologies
Santa Rosa, California

Pad cratering failure has emerged due to the transition from traditional SnPb to SnAgCu alloys in soldering of printed circuit assemblies. Pb-free-compatible laminate materials in the printed circuit board tend to fracture under ball grid array pads when subjected to high strain mechanical loads. In this study, two Pb-free-compatible laminates were tested, plus one dicy-cure non-Pb-free-compatible as control. One set of these samples were as-received and another was subjected to five reflows.

It is assumed that mechanical properties of different materials have an influence on the susceptibility of laminates to fracture. However, the pad cratering phenomenon occurs at the layer of resin between the exterior copper and the first glass in the weave. Bulk mechanical properties have not been a good indicator of pad crater susceptibility. In this study, mechanical characterization of hardness and Young's modulus was carried out in the critical area where pad cratering occurs using nano-indentation at the surface and in a cross-section.

The measurements show higher modulus and hardness in the Pb-free-compatible laminates than in the dicy-cured laminate. Few changes are seen after reflow - which is known to have an effect - indicating that these properties do not provide a complete prediction. Measurements of the copper pad showed significant material property changes after reflow.

This paper presents initial results of an effort to correlate pad cratering to the mechanical properties of laminate materials using nano-indentation. This method allows measurement in the localized resin layer where the fractures occur. Mechanical property measurements in the cross-section were higher than those made in the exposed resin on the surface, possibly due to the surface roughness. Both measurement locations showed the same trends:

It was found that phenolic-cured laminates had higher stiffness and hardness than the dicy cured laminate, as expected. The sample that has filler in the resin showed a decrease in Young's modulus after reflow, suggesting that the filler has an effect on the hardness change.

The lack of material change for the resins without filler does not match the pad crater susceptibility test results and experience expected: there is consistently an increase in susceptibility with reflows. The copper pad measurements showed that the hardness decreased after reflow for all samples. The as-received Young's modulus for the dicy-cured sample was significantly lower than for the Pb-free-compatible laminates and increased after reflow. This change could affect reliability of the copper.

It does not appear that Young's modulus or hardness correlate directly with pad crater susceptibility, although additional study would be helpful. The effect of lamination and reflow processes on material properties of the copper warrants additional study.

This study demonstrates that nano-indentation is a fast assessment technique to measure mechanical properties of laminate materials. This work obtains Young's modulus and hardness values in situ from a PCB as received and after reflow process, and look for a correlation between these mechanical properties and pad cratering.

Initially Published in the IPC Proceedings

There are many FR-4 phenolic cured products that are commercially available. These products were developed by using fracture toughness G1C and K1C measurements. It would have been great to see how these materials would have performed with this new test.
Douglas J. Sober, Essex Technologies Group, Inc.
Submit A Comment
Comments are reviewed prior to posting. Please avoid discussion of pricing or recommendations for specific products. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address.

Your Name






Please type the number displayed into the box. If you receive an error, you may need to refresh the page and resubmit the information.

Related Programs
bullet Can Water Contamination Cause Failure?
bullet Preparation for Mitigating Tin Whiskers in Alternative Lead-Free Alloys
bullet Analysis of Laminate Material Properties for Correlation to Pad Cratering
bullet Novel Approaches for Minimizing Pad Cratering
bullet Acceptable Rate for Head in Pillow?
bullet Testing PCBs for Creep Corrosion
bullet Mitigating Tin Whiskers in Alternative Lead-Free Alloys
bullet Human-Induced Contamination on PCB Assembly
bullet We Bake, But Still Have Delamination, Why?
bullet Influence of Salt Residues on BGA Head in Pillow
More Related Programs