Innovative Panel Plating for Heterogeneous Integration
A Method to Investigate PCB Supplier Rework Processes and Best Practices
The Effects of PCB Fabrication on High-Frequency Electrical Performance
Aerosol Jet Printing of Conductive Epoxy for 3D
EOS Exposure of Components in the Soldering Process
High Thermo-Mechanical Fatigue and Drop Shock Resistant Alloys
Filling of Microvias and Through Holes by Electrolytic Copper Plating
NASA DOD Phase 2: Copper Dissolution Testing
Latest Industry News
How Telecom is Rolling Out 5G During a Pandemic
Can Software Performance Engineering Save Us From the End of Moore's Law?
Tech stocks have been a winning bet, but investors worry it will fade
All This Chaos Might Be Giving You 'Crisis Fatigue'
Notebook PCB makers to see tight capacity through 3Q20
How Effective Is Nano Coating On Stencils?
U.S. Critical Infrastructure Full of Security Holes
Auto Interior Is the New Exterior

Quantifying Stencil Aperture Wall Quality

Quantifying Stencil Aperture Wall Quality
This paper discusses a method for the measurement of stencil aperture wall roughness, producing quantifiable results which can predict paste release performance.
Analysis Lab


Authored By:

Christopher Tibbetts, Michael Antinori
Analogic Corporation, Peabody, MA USA


SMT assembly quality is dependent on the consistent release of solder paste. This, in turn, can be greatly impacted by the quality of the stencil.

Stencil quality is traditionally judged by paste release performance. This approach only indirectly measures stencil quality. In a controlled study, using a single stencil design and single PCB type, performance differences between stencils may be identified. However outside of a controlled study, it can be very difficult to determine the quality of the stencil based on the observation of paste depositions as so many other factors affect paste release.

In production, poor stencil quality is often not recognized until defects are generated, with an associated cost. Since print quality is dependent not only on stencil quality, but also on the PCB surface, and screen printer programming, paste quality and many other factors, it is usually time consuming and costly to trace back poor print results to a low quality stencil.

It would advantageous if quality of stencils could be determined using an inspection method which did not require printing solder paste. Previous studies, where a subjective visual or SEM inspection of the aperture walls was performed, have suggested that there is a correlation between the smoothness of the walls and the transfer efficiency.

The goal of this study was to develop a method for the measurement of stencil aperture wall roughness, producing quantifiable results which can predict paste release performance. It is hoped that this method may then be used as a way of gauging the quality of individual stencils, evaluating stencil supplier and fabrication .


Aperture wall roughness can be measured and quantified using this method. In addition to measuring the roughness over an area, stencil fabrication defects, such as out of spec thickness and slag are easily detected. There appears to be a significant correlation between the Sa of a stencils aperture walls and release volumes based on the limited number of samples printed. While some additional work is needed in order to fine tune the design of the coupon, we believe this will prove helpful in determining the quality of stencils before printing.

The large variation in roughness for stencils cut with the same method indicates the quality of stencils cannot be predicted by specifying a certain fabrication method. For example, it is very clear that all laser cut stencils are not fabricated equally. In discussions with stencil vendors we found out that the type of laser used, the size of the beam, compressor type and cutting speed can greatly impact the quality of the aperture walls.

The manufacturing method and foil type appeared to have less of an impact on wall roughness than the cutting process. We found no evidence that there is any difference between Premium and less expensive 304 based foil stencils. Electroformed stencils, based on this study and informal findings in production, are often thinner than specified. This may be more of a factor in aiding release than the quality of the stencil walls.


No comments have been submitted to date.

Submit A Comment

Comments are reviewed prior to posting. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address.

Your Name

Your Company
Your E-mail

Your Country
Your Comments

Board Talk
How Effective Is Nano Coating On Stencils?
What Causes Board Delamination?
01005 Component Challenges and Bugs
Sticky Residue Under Low Clearance Parts
Soldering Relays Intrusively in Lead Free Process
Printing vs. Dispensing
Maximum Board Temperature During Tin-Lead
Is There a Spacing Spec for SMD Components?
Ask the Experts
Recommended Fiducial Shape
HASL vs. Immersion Gold
Very Low Temp PCBs
Looking for Long-term Component Storage Options
Baking After Cleaning Hand Placed Parts
Conformal Coating Recommendation
Burned Chip Repair
BGA Component Grounding Problem