Electronics Assembly Knowledge, Vision & Wisdom
Step Stencil Setup
Step Stencil Setup
When shifting from standard solder paste stencils to step stencils, should we change the pressure or attack angle?
Board Talk

,{url:'http://www.circuitinsight.com/videos/board_talk_step_stencil_process.mp4'}], clip:{autoBuffering:true, autoPlay:true, scaling:'scale' } }).ipad();
Board Talk is presented by ITM Consulting
Phil Zarrow
Phil Zarrow, ITM Consulting
With over 35 years experience in PCB assembly, Phil is one of the leading experts in SMT process failure analysis. He has vast experience in SMT equipment, materials and processes.

Jim Hall
Jim Hall, ITM Consulting
A Lean Six-Sigma Master Blackbelt, Jim has a wealth of knowledge in soldering, thermal technology, equipment and process basics. He is a pioneer in the science of reflow.
Welcome to Board Talk. You're here with Phil Zarrow and Jim Hall, the Assembly Brothers, talking about SMT process materials and all of that fun stuff.

Today's question is from M.K. When shifting from standard solder paste stencils to step stencils, should we change the pressure or attack angle?

I assume that would mean squeegee angle.

So, some shifty guy's stepping on somebody's stencils. That's not a very good best practice, is it? Well the answer is maybe yes, maybe no. As in the case of anything you're going to be basically setting up the to do, you have to do a design of experiment to ascertain the optimum settings on your printer.

And whether that's going to be any different or not depends. That sounds like somebody who's not doing their DOE properly. Doesn't it, Jim? One setup does all type of thing.

Phil, I think it's somebody else looking for the silver bullet, and in this situation, when using step stencil, just do this, and everything will be perfect. Wouldn't it be wonderful if the world was like that, but unfortunately, it ain't.

You should be checking pressure and attack angle, speed, and everything with every different stencil you use. Few people do that because their stencils are very similar in terms of geometries and size of apertures and so forth, but technically, you should optimize the printing by adjusting those parameters for every stencil and certainly, when you make a significant change, as M.K. is indicating, going from standard one thickness stencils to step stencils.

Usually attack angle is fixed, based on the type of machine you're using. But everything else, including your squeegee speed, pressure and everything else is part of the proper setup.

Do your due diligence.

And with all due diligence, Phil, there are newer printer machines that do advocate using adjustment of squeegee angle, and some of them, I believe, at one point, would actually allow you to adjust it in the middle of the stroke.

I certainly have never worked with one or never seen one, but I believe that I have heard a claim and maybe a tech paper advocating the desirability for changing squeegee angle, and dynamic squeegee.

Good luck, optimize your stencil printing processes as much as you can, and whatever you do, don't solder like my brother.

And don't solder like my brother whether you're doing step stencils or not.
Reader Comment

The Yamaha YSP printer does allow you to adjust the Squeegee angle from 65-45 degrees (3-S Print Head). Printing experiments have shown that by decreasing the angle you can apply more downward force to the material thus helping fill the aperture. Combine this with metal blades that are half etched along the edge and you will get a better clearing (shearing) of the paste out of the pocket stabilizing the variation in volume from print to print. The angle is controlled by servo-motors and is set in the software.

Ed Nauss, Yamaha IM America, USA
Reader Comment

Many of our customers will switch to polyurethane squeegee blades when printing with stepped stencils. I believe that 80 durometer is the hardness that has the most success. The polyurethane blade will contour to the shape of the step, getting down inside recessed areas of a stepped stencil to wipe it clean so that solder & flux residue won't build up and cause problems on subsequent print cycles.

We have recently had several customers come to us who are using "stepped up" stencils, and the polyurethane blades work very well in these applications as well. The poly blades will also contour to the shape of the raised step, and provide a better wipe in these situations. Squeegee speed and pressure adjustments are generally needed when switching from metal to polyurethane blades. Hopefully the board/stencil designer took into consideration the real estate that is necessary surrounding the stepped stencil area so that adjacent components and their stencil printing requirements won't be affected by the stepped stencil. When printing with a stepped stencil, the squeegee blades needs a certain amount of time and space to react and adjust back to the non stepped portion of the stencil.

Bob Enterkin, JNJ Industries, USA
Submit A Comment

Comments are reviewed prior to posting. Please avoid discussion of pricing or recommendations for specific products. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address.

Your Name






Please type the number displayed into the box. If you receive an error, you may need to refresh the page and resubmit the information.

Related Programs
bullet Selective Printing for BGA Components
bullet Assembly Options for Handheld Products
bullet Assembling Boards with BGAs on Both Sides
bullet Problems to Look for with Crimp Terminations
bullet How to Clamp Odd Shaped Circuit Boards
bullet Assembly and Reliability Investigation of PoP
bullet Evaluation of Stencil Materials, Suppliers and Coatings
bullet What is Solder Paste Working Life on a Stencil?
bullet How To Calculate Component Standoff Height
bullet Humidity Inside Our Screen Printer
More Related Programs
About | Advertising | Contact | Directory | Directory Search | Directory Submit | Privacy | Programs | Program Search | Sponsorship | Subscribe | Terms

Circuit Insight
6 Liberty Square #2040, Boston MA 02109 USA

Jeff Ferry, Publisher | Ken Cavallaro, Editor/Business Manager

Copyright © Circuitnet LLC. All rights reserved.
A Circuitnet Media Publication