Research
Embedded Components from Concept-To-Manufacturing
Copper Foil Elements Affecting Transmission Loss with High Speed Circuits
pH neutral Cleaning Agents - Market Expectation & Field Performance
Reducing Dust Deposition on Electronic Equipment
New Requirements for Sir Measurement
Effects of Mixing Solder Sphere Alloys with Bismuth-Based Pastes
The Development of a 0.3 mm Pitch CSP Assembly Process
Generalizations About Component Flatness at Elevated Temperature
MORE RESEARCH
Latest Industry News
iPhone 12 Production Could Be Delayed
Acer sees PC component shortages
Bio-Ink for 3-D Printing Inside the Body
Covid Seen Driving the Security Sector
U.S. Eases Restrictions on Private Remote-Sensing Satellites
EMS Manufacturing quote complexity drives OEMs to look behind EMS curtain
U.S. Manufacturing Rebounds to 14-Month High
IBM's New AI Tool Parses A Tidal Wave of Coronavirus Research
MORE INDUSTRY NEWS

Cleanliness Assessment for Class III Lead-Free No-Clean Assemblies



Cleanliness Assessment for Class III Lead-Free No-Clean Assemblies
This study qualifies an aqueous cleaning process capable of removing combinations of no-clean flux residues for Class III electronic assemblies.
Analysis Lab

DOWNLOAD

Authored By:


Umut Tosun, M.S.Chem.Eng., Ravi Parthasarathy, M.S.Chem.Eng., Michael McCutchen, M.S.Chem.
ZESTRON America, Manassas, VA USA

Summary


For mission critical electronics or Class III products, such as those used within the military, aerospace and medical industries, highest electronic reliability is a requirement as failure is not an option. Within the electronics industry, this means that residues, either ionic or non-ionic, must be fully removed. Partially removed or untouched residues can lead to component and product failures resulting from electrochemical migration, dendrite growth and electrical leakage currents.

The goal of this study was to identify and qualify an aqueous cleaning process capable of removing combinations of no-clean flux residues for Class III electronic assemblies. Teamed with a global electronic manufacturing service (EMS) provider supplying electronics to the aerospace and medical industry, the Design of Experiment (DOE) developed was executed in two phases. Initial testing was completed utilizing EMS boards and final testing was validated using IPC test coupons and standards.

Conclusions


When building Class III products, it is essential to thoroughly understand the cleaning process and be assured that it has been optimized based on board design, cleaning equipment type, cleaning agent selected, operating parameters used, paste and flux types used and residues generated. The OEM for which this DOE was developed understood the importance of the cleaning process and sought empirical data to design and verify the cleaning process.

Using the EMS's boards and paste and flux details, a DOE was developed enabling ZESTRON to select the most suitable cleaning agent and implement a testing program with cleaning equipment similar to that used by the EMS. Cleaning equipment parameters were optimized and excellent cleaning results were obtained as indicated by visual inspection and ionic contamination analyses. The cleaning process efficiency was verified using EMS boards through Ion Chromatography and SEC analyses. Finally, additional verification regarding the effectiveness of the cleaning process as obtained through the use of SIR and ECM analyses employing IPC test coupons.

Once both the OEM and EMC were assured that the recommended cleaning process met their Class III cleanliness requirements, material and component compatibility testing was conducted. Critical board components were found to be completely compatible; however, the label supplier was required to make a top coat change on one of the two labels used.

Based on the results of this DOE, the cleaning process was implemented at the EMS site and cleaning results were subsequently validated as meeting the OEM cleanliness specifications.

Initially Published in the IPC Proceedings

Comments

No comments have been submitted to date.

Submit A Comment


Comments are reviewed prior to posting. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address.

Your Name


Your Company
Your E-mail


Your Country
Your Comments



Board Talk
Solder Paste Beyond The Shelf Life?
Issues With Fillets on Via Holes?
Can Tape Residue Contaminate a Clean Tank?
Suggested Stencil Wipe Frequency?
Reflow Oven Zone Separation Challenges
When To Use Adhesive To Bond SMT Components
How To Clean a Vintage Circuit Board Assembly?
PCBA Inspection Concerns
MORE BOARD TALK
Ask the Experts
Lifted Lead on SOT Component
Allowable Bow and Twist on Round PC Fab
Mixed MSL Baking
Step Stencil Squeegee Angle
Solder Balling Splash After Reflow
Application Using No-Clean and Water Soluble Fluxes
IPC SOIC Defect Question
Mixed Process Solder Joint Appearance, Smooth or Grainy?
MORE ASK THE EXPERTS