Electronics Assembly Knowledge, Vision & Wisdom
Ask the Experts
BGA Die and Pry Testing
Are these results Kirkendall Voiding or some other defect? The defect appears after 500 operating cycles on a batch of assemblies.
Ask the Experts

View the Expert comments below.
,{url:'http://www.circuitinsight.com/videos/experts_final.mp4'}], clip:{autoBuffering:true, autoPlay:true, scaling:'scale' } }).ipad();

Arranged via association with Circuitnet..
See the Expert Panel | Submit A Questions | Join the Panel
Ask the Experts Question
Ask the Experts
BGA Die and Pry Testing
See the image of a die and pry flip chip BGA. Are these results Kirkendall Voiding or some other defect? The defect appears after 500 operating cycles on a batch of assemblies. Would you recommend that we rework the remaining assemblies?
BGA Die and Pry Testing
BGA Die and Pry Testing

J.J.
Expert's Panel Responses
I would need more information to make the determination as to whether or not these are Kirkendall voids, as Kirkendall voids are at the intermetallic layer and this cannot be determined from these pictures.

The other issue is what alloy was the solder balls on the BGA and what solder alloy was used as solder paste? The right hand pictures displays penetration of the dye around the circumference of the pad so I would guess that the pad was not completely wetted with the base solder alloy or this is where the fracturing of the solder joint started to occur. In either case more information would be needed to fully assess the situation.
image
Leo Lambert
Vice President, Technical Director
EPTAC Corporation
At EPTAC Corporation, Mr. Lambert oversees content of course offerings, IPC Certification programs and provides customers with expert consultation in electronics manufacturing, including RoHS/WEEE and lead free issues. Leo is also the IPC General Chairman for the Assembly/Joining Process Committee.
In short, I think it's unlikely that the root cause of the observed defect is Kirkendall voiding. What's needed for root cause analysis is a detailed analysis of the surface and subsurface metallurgy. Dye & pry has told you that some crack propagation has begun Perhaps not unexpected at 500 cycles. Now you need to bring the appropriate tools and methods to get to root cause. What I would do is:
  • Strategically select some planes to cross section on parts that have seen the same thermal history but have not been subjected to dye & pry. The planes should be selected to evaluate the varying stresses seen by corner balls vs. balls nearer the package centroid.
  • Evaluate the fracture surfaces of the parts removed in the dye &pry process, and their mating PWB lands. An SEM and/or a very good metallurgical microscope will be invaluable here.
  • Perform modeling of the PWB/component system to see whether the result is predicted. 
This may in fact be the normal situation at 500 cycles for the combination of component, PWB, solder alloy, thermal cycling conditions, etc., but we cannot say (not without a lot of additional information).  
image
Fritz Byle
Process Engineer
Astronautics
Fritz's career in electronics manufacturing has included diverse engineering roles including PWB fabrication, thick film print & fire, SMT and wave/selective solder process engineering, and electronics materials development and marketing. Fritz's educational background is in mechanical engineering with an emphasis on materials science. Design of Experiments (DoE) techniques have been an area of independent study. Fritz has published over a dozen papers at various industry conferences.
The amount of dye penetration looks too extensive for Kirkendall voids. Are the images showing ball separation from the chip?
Gerard O'Brien
President
S T and S Testing and Analysis
Gerald O'Brien is Chairman of ANSI J-STD 003, and Co Chairman of IPC 4-14 Surface Finish Plating Committee. He is a key member of ANSI J-STD 002 and 311 G Committees Expert in Surface finish, Solderability issues and Failure analysis in the PWA, PWB and component fields.
I don't think that it's Kirkendall voiding. It looks like poor wetting/ bad adhesion. After 500 cycles it may be strain due to TCE mismatch affecting the solder (creep/fatigue failure). Do you underfill?
image
Lee Levine
President, Consultant
Process Solutions Consulting Inc.
Lee Levine has been a Process Engineer and Metallurgist in the semiconductor industry for 30 years. He now operates his own company Process Solutions Consulting Inc where he consults on process issues and provides SEM/EDS and metallography services.
Without additional information it is difficult to be definitive on the voids shown in the picture.  Kirkendall voids are typically irregular in shape and only a few microns in size, although there is no scale on the pictures these look to be much larger in size and appear to be spherical in shape. Also I would expect more of them if they were Kirkendall. It is extremely difficult to rework voids out of array components so I doubt that reworking parts will help. Finally The pictures do not appear to show die penetration in to any of the voids so the voids may not be the cause of the failure.
Neil Poole
Senior Applications Chemist
Henkel Electronics
Dr. Poole is a Senior Applications Chemist in Henkel Technologies, electronics assembly materials application engineering group. He is responsible for all of Henkel's assembly products including soldering products, underfills, PCB protection materials, and thermally conductive adhesives.
Submit A Comment

Comments are reviewed prior to posting. Please avoid discussion of pricing or recommendations for specific products. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address.

Your Name


Company


E-mail


Country


Comments


Authentication

Please type the number displayed into the box. If you attempt to submit information and receive an error, you may need to refresh the page and insert the information again.



Related Programs
bullet Early Design Review of Boundary Scan To Enhancing Testability
bullet Combination of AOI and AVI Machines
bullet Explanation of PoP Inspection Techniques
bullet Thermal Mechanical Fatigue of a 56 I/O Quad-Flat No Lead Package
bullet Numerical Study on New Pin Pull Test for Pad Cratering
bullet Test Probe Problems After Pin-In-Paste
bullet Pb-Free Thermal Cycle Acceleration Factors
bullet Drop Test Performance of BGA Assemblies
bullet Expanding IEEE Std 1149.1 Boundary-Scan Architecture
bullet Analysis of Voiding Under QFN Packages
More Related Programs
About | Advertising | Contact | Directory | Directory Search | Directory Submit | Privacy | Programs | Program Search | Sponsorship | Subscribe | Terms

Circuit Insight
6 Liberty Square #2040, Boston MA 02109 USA

Jeff Ferry, Publisher | Ken Cavallaro, Editor/Business Manager

Copyright © Circuitnet LLC. All rights reserved.
A Circuitnet Media Publication