Electronics Assembly Knowledge, Vision & Wisdom
Comparison of Solder Paste Residues
Comparison of Solder Paste Residues
Paper assesses the reliability of several lead-free, no clean paste residues after vapor phase reflow in comparison to convection reflow.
Analysis Lab

Authored By:
Emmanuelle Guéné, Anne-Marie Laügt, Céline Puechagut, Aurélie Ducoulombier
Inventec Performance Chemicals
Bry sur Marne, France
,{url:'http://www.circuitinsight.com/videos/programs_final.mp4'}], clip:{autoBuffering:true, autoPlay:true, scaling:'scale' } }).ipad();
Summary
Convection soldering remains the most common reflow process in electronic assembly, mostly in air, but sometimes using a nitrogen atmosphere to reduce oxidation. On the other hand, vapor phase soldering remains a niche market: it has been dedicated for years for use on complex boards with heavy mass and/or a large mix of component sizes.

Despite its excellent heat transfer capabilities and high wetting performance, this process suffered from weaknesses that prevented it from being used on a large scale: high fluid consumption (CFCs), high tombstoning effect, long process time, and the inability to integrate it into a production line. In the last few years, vapor phase reflow technology has been improved: New fluids, with boiling temperatures up to 240C, have been developed, the consumptions have been greatly reduced and the control of preheat and peak ramp rate has been improved, lowering the tombstoning effect.

With lead-free implementation, some limitations are observed on complex boards with convection ovens: the thermal reflow process window is reduced due to the higher temperatures required for SAC alloys, the maximum temperature allowed for fragile components, and the wide range of component sizes. Vapor phase reflow might be an option to consider.

However, because of the relatively low peak temperatures and the elimination of oxidation with this process, a question may arise about the reliability of the paste residue. More unburned activators might remain on the board, which could cause some corrosion to develop, even when using no-clean solder pastes.

The purpose of this paper is to assess the reliability of several lead-free, no-clean paste residues after vapor phase reflow in comparison to convection reflow. The authors will use Surface Insulation Resistance (SIR) and Electrochemical Migration (ECM) according to IPC standards, in addition to the Bono test which has been proven to better differentiate the nature of solder pastes residue.
Initially Published in the IPC Proceedings
Submit A Comment

Comments are reviewed prior to posting. Please avoid discussion of pricing or recommendations for specific products. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address.

Your Name


Company


E-mail


Country


Comments


Authentication

Please type the number displayed into the box. If you receive an error, you may need to refresh the page and resubmit the information.



Related Programs
bullet Mitigating Tin Whiskers in Alternative Lead-Free Alloys
bullet Testing PCBs for Creep Corrosion
bullet Gold Contact Flux Contamination Failures
bullet What Causes Oxidation on SMT Pads?
bullet Causes of Popcorn Defects in Plastic Packages
bullet Issues with Circuit Boards Exposed to Rain
bullet Addressing Head-In-Pillow Defects
bullet Pad Cratering Evaluation of PCBs
bullet Acceptable Rate for Head in Pillow?
bullet Human-Induced Contamination on PCB Assembly
More Related Programs
About | Advertising | Contact | Directory | Directory Search | Directory Submit | Privacy | Programs | Program Search | Sponsorship | Subscribe | Terms

Circuit Insight
6 Liberty Square #2040, Boston MA 02109 USA

Jeff Ferry, Publisher | Ken Cavallaro, Editor/Business Manager

Copyright © Circuitnet LLC. All rights reserved.
A Circuitnet Media Publication