Electronics Assembly Knowledge, Vision & Wisdom
Lead-Free Flux and Influence on Cleaning
Lead-Free Flux and Influence on Cleaning
Lead-free flux technology is more difficult to clean. Cleaners with a better matching solvency for the residues are needed.
Production Floor

Authored By:
Dr. Ning-Cheng Lee
Indium Corporation, Clinton, NY USA
,{url:'http://www.circuitinsight.com/videos/programs_final.mp4'}], clip:{autoBuffering:true, autoPlay:true, scaling:'scale' } }).ipad();
Summary
Lead-free flux technology for electronic industry is mainly driven by high soldering temperature, high alloy surface tension, miniaturization, air soldering due to low cost consideration, and environmental concern. Accordingly, the flux features desired included high thermal stability, high resistance against burn-off, high oxidation resistance, high oxygen barrier capability, low surface tension, high fluxing capacity, slow wetting, low moisture pickup, high hot viscosity, and halogen-free.

For each of the feature listed above, corresponding desired chemical structures can be deduced, and the
impact of those structure on flux residue cleanability can be speculated. Overall, lead-free flux technology results in a greater difficulty in cleaning. Cleaner with a better matching solvency for the residue as well as a higher cleaning temperature or agitation are needed. Alkaline and polar cleaner are often needed to deal with the larger quantity of fluxing products. Reactive cleaner is also desired to address the side reaction products such as crosslinked residue.
Conclusions
Lead-free flux technology for electronic industry is mainly driven by high soldering temperature, high alloy surface tension, miniaturization, air soldering due to low cost consideration, and environmental concern. Accordingly, the flux features desired included high thermal stability, high resistance against burn-off, high oxidation resistance, high oxygen barrier capability, low surface tension, high fluxing capacity, slow wetting, low moisture pickup, high hot viscosity, and halogen-free.

For each of the feature listed above, corresponding desired chemical structures can be deduced, and the
impact of those structure on flux residue cleanability can be speculated. Overall, lead-free flux technology results in a greater difficulty in cleaning. Cleaner with a better matching solvency for the residue as well as a higher cleaning temperature or agitation are needed. Alkaline and polar cleaner are often needed to deal with the larger quantity of fluxing products. Reactive cleaner is also desired to address the side reaction products such as crosslinked residue.
Initially Published in the IPC Proceedings
Submit A Comment

Comments are reviewed prior to posting. Please avoid discussion of pricing or recommendations for specific products. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address.

Your Name


Company


E-mail


Country


Comments


Authentication

Please type the number displayed into the box. If you receive an error, you may need to refresh the page and resubmit the information.



Related Programs
bullet pH neutral Cleaning Agents - Market Expectation & Field Performance
bullet White Discoloration After Ultrasonic Cleaning
bullet Defluxing for New Assembly Requirements
bullet Cost Comparison: Batch and Inline Cleaners
bullet Mixed Cleaning for Tin-lead and Lead-free
bullet Is No-Clean the Trend for QFN Components?
bullet How Clean is Clean?
bullet Pros and Cons of Cleaning No-clean
bullet Mixed Cleaning - No Clean and Water Soluble
bullet Cleaning PCBs - Understanding Todays Needs
More Related Programs
About | Advertising | Contact | Directory | Directory Search | Directory Submit | Privacy | Programs | Program Search | Sponsorship | Subscribe | Terms

Circuit Insight
6 Liberty Square #2040, Boston MA 02109 USA

Jeff Ferry, Publisher | Ken Cavallaro, Editor/Business Manager

Copyright © Circuitnet LLC. All rights reserved.
A Circuitnet Media Publication