Transcript
Phil
Welcome to the Board Talk. This is Phil Zarrow and Jim Hall of ITM Consulting, otherwise known as The Assembly Brothers. We're here at Board Talk to answer or have fun with your questions concerning SMT process assembly materials equipment and whatnot.
Today's question is: "can conductive epoxies be considered a viable RoHS substitute for tin lead solder?"
It's a question that's been asked many times over the ages, especially since the original advent of RoHS appearing on the horizon. It's something we've touched on before in one of our other diatribes on conductive epoxy. Fundamentally yeah, you could consider it, but from a practical standpoint, not really.
This was originally examined back in the early days of getting ready for RoHS. Motorola Schaumberg IL, did some major investigation into this at the time and they decided - no. There's a number of limitations with conductive epoxies regarding how they fare in terms of robustness compared to tin lead solder. Jim, do you want to elaborate on that a little bit?
Jim
Probably the most predominant concern is that the conductivity of the material degrades over time. That is, the net contact resistance goes up. So, for many applications that can eventually damage your signal flow through your circuit. That's the biggest one.
Other issues that are raised are difficulties reworking, and some of the structural properties. Depending upon what your failure modes are, in some cases the epoxies can be more robust. But in others, cycling or vibration and so forth, they are less robust.
The final issue is cost. Most of the ones that work successfully are filled with silver or gold. Silver is expensive. Phil, did that Motorola study have a rough estimate, even back in those days when metals were cheap?
Phil
Yeah, the study was done at least 12 or 15 years ago and the cost of silver-filled conductive epoxy was at that point about 10 times the cost per gram of tin-lead solder. Can you imagine what gold-filled epoxies were going for?
Jim
One of the possibilities that has been tested many times is a copper-filled material, but nobody has mastered that to achieve the reliability level of silver-filled.
Phil
So, one the surface, the idea looks really good. It's a no clean, it's lead-free, you don't have to worry about VOCs, no cadmium, chromium or mercury.
But when you start cross sectioning, at least in its present state it's not a great idea. But remember, things tend to change and improve, so, you never know. And with that, we say thank you for tuning in to Board Talk and this is Jim Hall and Phil Zarrow saying whatever you do...
Jim
Don't solder like my brother
Phil
And don't solder like my brother. And quit snorting the conductive epoxies, too. It's not good for you.
|
